<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life is Too Short to Deal with Non-Accredited Investors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://startuplawyer.com/convertible-notes/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors</link>
	<description>Startup Law, Incorporation, Convertible Notes, Preferred Stock, Stock Options, Venture Capital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:35:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rustin</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-11416</link>
		<dc:creator>Rustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-11416</guid>
		<description>Phil -

I know it&#039;s rather too late. Answer I found was to add them as co-founders as convertible note, further coupled by vest founders shares, which is common stock.

This should be a positive reflection as it does not present any conflicts against any preferred stock options or similar equity.

Then again, I&#039;m no lawyer and just how I approached this problem.

Best of luck with your new adventure. Have fun with it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil -</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s rather too late. Answer I found was to add them as co-founders as convertible note, further coupled by vest founders shares, which is common stock.</p>
<p>This should be a positive reflection as it does not present any conflicts against any preferred stock options or similar equity.</p>
<p>Then again, I&#8217;m no lawyer and just how I approached this problem.</p>
<p>Best of luck with your new adventure. Have fun with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I am a non-accredited investor and one private company has just purchased the private company that I hold shares can I force them to buy me out? - Quora</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-10898</link>
		<dc:creator>I am a non-accredited investor and one private company has just purchased the private company that I hold shares can I force them to buy me out? - Quora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-10898</guid>
		<description>[...] they may want to &quot;buy you out&quot;, this blog post has a nice summary of the &quot;why&quot; http://startuplawyer.com/preferr.... Depending on where the company is located and/or incorporated you may have dissenters&#039; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they may want to &quot;buy you out&quot;, this blog post has a nice summary of the &quot;why&quot; <a href="http://startuplawyer.com/preferr..." rel="nofollow">http://startuplawyer.com/preferr&#8230;</a>. Depending on where the company is located and/or incorporated you may have dissenters&#039; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Checklist Every Entrepreneur Should Read Before Launching a Startup</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-10763</link>
		<dc:creator>The Checklist Every Entrepreneur Should Read Before Launching a Startup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-10763</guid>
		<description>[...] Capital 1. Length of NDA: 0 pages 2. Fees Paid to Pitch my Startup: $0 3. Investors: Accredited Investors 4. Structure of First Capital Raise up to $1MM: Convertible Notes&#160;By Ryan Roberts, a startup [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Capital 1. Length of NDA: 0 pages 2. Fees Paid to Pitch my Startup: $0 3. Investors: Accredited Investors 4. Structure of First Capital Raise up to $1MM: Convertible Notes&nbsp;By Ryan Roberts, a startup [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quora</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-10480</link>
		<dc:creator>Quora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 23:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-10480</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What are the best online resources (blogs, podcasts, articles, etc.) on startups and entrepreneurship?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Incorporation * Startup Company Laywer: What type of entity should I form? (http://www.startupcompanylawyer.com/2009/03/12/what-type-of-entity-should-i-form/) * Startup Company Lawyer: What state should I incorporate in? (http://www.startupcompanylawye...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What are the best online resources (blogs, podcasts, articles, etc.) on startups and entrepreneurship?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Incorporation * Startup Company Laywer: What type of entity should I form? (http://www.startupcompanylawyer.com/2009/03/12/what-type-of-entity-should-i-form/) * Startup Company Lawyer: What state should I incorporate in? (http://www.startupcompanylawye&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-4061</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-4061</guid>
		<description>Phil, did you ever recieve an aswer to this question?  is it posted ro can you ahsre the answer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, did you ever recieve an aswer to this question?  is it posted ro can you ahsre the answer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-4062</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-4062</guid>
		<description>Phil, did you ever recieve an aswer to this question?  is it posted ro can you ahsre the answer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, did you ever recieve an aswer to this question?  is it posted ro can you ahsre the answer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-2057</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-2057</guid>
		<description>Does Qualifed 401 or IRA money exempt the Investor from the accredited Investor Rule? ie - If someone making say 100K per year wants to pull 150K out of their 300K Retirement Accounts to invest, do they have to meet Regulation D&#8217;s Rule 501 of the federal securities laws as an Accredited Investor to invest this money even thought their Net Worth is not $1,000,000 and/or they don&#039;t make over $200K annually? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Qualifed 401 or IRA money exempt the Investor from the accredited Investor Rule? ie &#8211; If someone making say 100K per year wants to pull 150K out of their 300K Retirement Accounts to invest, do they have to meet Regulation D&rsquo;s Rule 501 of the federal securities laws as an Accredited Investor to invest this money even thought their Net Worth is not $1,000,000 and/or they don&#39;t make over $200K annually?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-2434</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-2434</guid>
		<description>Does Qualifed 401 or IRA money exempt the Investor from the accredited Investor Rule? ie - If someone making say 100K per year wants to pull 150K out of their 300K Retirement Accounts to invest, do they have to meet Regulation D&#8217;s Rule 501 of the federal securities laws as an Accredited Investor to invest this money even thought their Net Worth is not $1,000,000 and/or they don&#039;t make over $200K annually?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Qualifed 401 or IRA money exempt the Investor from the accredited Investor Rule? ie &#8211; If someone making say 100K per year wants to pull 150K out of their 300K Retirement Accounts to invest, do they have to meet Regulation D&rsquo;s Rule 501 of the federal securities laws as an Accredited Investor to invest this money even thought their Net Worth is not $1,000,000 and/or they don&#039;t make over $200K annually?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-1707</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-1707</guid>
		<description>Can anyone come up with a legal structure under which unaccredited investors can pool funds together for the purpose of investing in early stage companies?  What requirements would the &quot;pool&quot; need to meet to be able to take money from unaccredited investors and invest it in unregistered companies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone come up with a legal structure under which unaccredited investors can pool funds together for the purpose of investing in early stage companies?  What requirements would the &#8220;pool&#8221; need to meet to be able to take money from unaccredited investors and invest it in unregistered companies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-2433</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-2433</guid>
		<description>Can anyone come up with a legal structure under which unaccredited investors can pool funds together for the purpose of investing in early stage companies?  What requirements would the &quot;pool&quot; need to meet to be able to take money from unaccredited investors and invest it in unregistered companies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone come up with a legal structure under which unaccredited investors can pool funds together for the purpose of investing in early stage companies?  What requirements would the &#8220;pool&#8221; need to meet to be able to take money from unaccredited investors and invest it in unregistered companies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-1630</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 12:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-1630</guid>
		<description>Ryan - I&#039;ve heard there is a &quot;business relationship&quot; test that allows a company to raise capital from a non-accredited investor without providing all of the disclosure information only if the non-accredited investor has intimate knowledge of the business he or she is investing in.  Do you know anything about this test?  Thanks a lot. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan &#8211; I&#39;ve heard there is a &quot;business relationship&quot; test that allows a company to raise capital from a non-accredited investor without providing all of the disclosure information only if the non-accredited investor has intimate knowledge of the business he or she is investing in.  Do you know anything about this test?  Thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-2432</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 12:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-2432</guid>
		<description>Ryan - I&#039;ve heard there is a &quot;business relationship&quot; test that allows a company to raise capital from a non-accredited investor without providing all of the disclosure information only if the non-accredited investor has intimate knowledge of the business he or she is investing in.  Do you know anything about this test?  Thanks a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan &#8211; I&#039;ve heard there is a &quot;business relationship&quot; test that allows a company to raise capital from a non-accredited investor without providing all of the disclosure information only if the non-accredited investor has intimate knowledge of the business he or she is investing in.  Do you know anything about this test?  Thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-1378</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-1378</guid>
		<description>Ryan - 
 
thanks so much for getting back to me. I guess I&#039;m trying to reconcile a) Rule 506&#039;s general information requirements (specifically, 502(b)) and b) a start-up that has low or no information about itself yet and is essentially raising money. Any thoughts? 
 
Thanks! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan -</p>
<p>thanks so much for getting back to me. I guess I&#39;m trying to reconcile a) Rule 506&#39;s general information requirements (specifically, 502(b)) and b) a start-up that has low or no information about itself yet and is essentially raising money. Any thoughts?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-2431</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-2431</guid>
		<description>Ryan - 
 
thanks so much for getting back to me. I guess I&#039;m trying to reconcile a) Rule 506&#039;s general information requirements (specifically, 502(b)) and b) a start-up that has low or no information about itself yet and is essentially raising money. Any thoughts? 
 
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan -</p>
<p>thanks so much for getting back to me. I guess I&#039;m trying to reconcile a) Rule 506&#039;s general information requirements (specifically, 502(b)) and b) a start-up that has low or no information about itself yet and is essentially raising money. Any thoughts?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Roberts</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-1305</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-1305</guid>
		<description>Wendy - Senator Dodd&#039;s bill would ruin a bunch of things for startups and investors. 
 
Rule 506 (in it&#039;s current, pre-Dodd Bill state) has the benefit of pre-empting state securities law.  Essentially, if you comply with Rule 506, the startup only has to make a notice filing with the state(s). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendy &#8211; Senator Dodd&#39;s bill would ruin a bunch of things for startups and investors.</p>
<p>Rule 506 (in it&#39;s current, pre-Dodd Bill state) has the benefit of pre-empting state securities law.  Essentially, if you comply with Rule 506, the startup only has to make a notice filing with the state(s).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Roberts</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-2430</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-2430</guid>
		<description>Wendy - Senator Dodd&#039;s bill would ruin a bunch of things for startups and investors. 
 
Rule 506 (in it&#039;s current, pre-Dodd Bill state) has the benefit of pre-empting state securities law.  Essentially, if you comply with Rule 506, the startup only has to make a notice filing with the state(s).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendy &#8211; Senator Dodd&#039;s bill would ruin a bunch of things for startups and investors.</p>
<p>Rule 506 (in it&#039;s current, pre-Dodd Bill state) has the benefit of pre-empting state securities law.  Essentially, if you comply with Rule 506, the startup only has to make a notice filing with the state(s).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-1304</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-1304</guid>
		<description>Ryan - 
 
I think you are dead on for points 2. and 3. 
 
Regarding 1., although Rule 506 provides safe harbor for 4(2), can&#039;t one just claim an exemption under 4(2) and by-pass requirements for 506? Also, Senator Dodd&#039;s bill will kill accredited investor financing in the short-term if the SEC has 120 days to sit on everything. 
 
 If a start-up simply doesn&#039;t have much financial information in the beginning, it would seem that using 4(2) and raising money from non-accredited investors wouldn&#039;t be that bad (taking into account your 2. and 3. above). 
 
Thoughts? 
 
Thanks, Wendy </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan -</p>
<p>I think you are dead on for points 2. and 3.</p>
<p>Regarding 1., although Rule 506 provides safe harbor for 4(2), can&#39;t one just claim an exemption under 4(2) and by-pass requirements for 506? Also, Senator Dodd&#39;s bill will kill accredited investor financing in the short-term if the SEC has 120 days to sit on everything.</p>
<p> If a start-up simply doesn&#39;t have much financial information in the beginning, it would seem that using 4(2) and raising money from non-accredited investors wouldn&#39;t be that bad (taking into account your 2. and 3. above).</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
<p>Thanks, Wendy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-2429</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-2429</guid>
		<description>Ryan - 
 
I think you are dead on for points 2. and 3. 
 
Regarding 1., although Rule 506 provides safe harbor for 4(2), can&#039;t one just claim an exemption under 4(2) and by-pass requirements for 506? Also, Senator Dodd&#039;s bill will kill accredited investor financing in the short-term if the SEC has 120 days to sit on everything. 
 
 If a start-up simply doesn&#039;t have much financial information in the beginning, it would seem that using 4(2) and raising money from non-accredited investors wouldn&#039;t be that bad (taking into account your 2. and 3. above). 
 
Thoughts? 
 
Thanks, Wendy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan -</p>
<p>I think you are dead on for points 2. and 3.</p>
<p>Regarding 1., although Rule 506 provides safe harbor for 4(2), can&#039;t one just claim an exemption under 4(2) and by-pass requirements for 506? Also, Senator Dodd&#039;s bill will kill accredited investor financing in the short-term if the SEC has 120 days to sit on everything.</p>
<p> If a start-up simply doesn&#039;t have much financial information in the beginning, it would seem that using 4(2) and raising money from non-accredited investors wouldn&#039;t be that bad (taking into account your 2. and 3. above).</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
<p>Thanks, Wendy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reading: Session 8 &#8211; Getting Financed — Start Your Business Course</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Reading: Session 8 &#8211; Getting Financed — Start Your Business Course</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-117</guid>
		<description>[...] Life is Too Short to Deal with Non-Accredited Investors [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Life is Too Short to Deal with Non-Accredited Investors [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/life-is-too-short-to-deal-with-non-accredited-investors#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>North</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=170#comment-116</guid>
		<description>What about friends and family? Aren&#039;t people with whom you have a &quot;preexisting relationship&quot; in the same category as qualified investors? 
 
Thanks, this site is a big help. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about friends and family? Aren&#39;t people with whom you have a &quot;preexisting relationship&quot; in the same category as qualified investors? </p>
<p>Thanks, this site is a big help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

