1. That's the tension with class F stock. It's beens suggested that some VCs have accepted it, but I have reservations they would not also put in typical protective provisions in their series A stock.

2. – 3. I think trying to come up with a level playing field for all startup-VC transactions is going to be futile. The best way to level the playing field is to have leverage.

4. Startup CEO's get sacked because they may not be the right person to take the startup from Series A to Exit. It really just depends on the CEO/Founder.

5. This depends on the economic rights of the series A (i.e. liquidation preference, etc.) A VC is not going to receive Common Stock as their investment.

1. That's the tension with class F stock. It's beens suggested that some VCs have accepted it, but I have reservations they would not also put in typical protective provisions in their series A stock.

2. – 3. I think trying to come up with a level playing field for all startup-VC transactions is going to be futile. The best way to level the playing field is to have leverage.

4. Startup CEO's get sacked because they may not be the right person to take the startup from Series A to Exit. It really just depends on the CEO/Founder.

5. This depends on the economic rights of the series A (i.e. liquidation preference, etc.) A VC is not going to receive Common Stock as their investment.

I want to know some facts from the VC Angle:
1. How will this change of accepting Class F stock affect VC’s if they have such high voting right & board rights. What will be the role of a VC who has a board seat if the founders blindly keep passing all the bills just because they have more than 50% control at all times.
2. How can we have even play
3. I feel Class F is too founder friendly, how can we alter the voting power & board votes ratio to be in such a way that can have a level playing field
4. Understand that the CEO’s are getting laid off with out reason. We could have a founder friendly clause saying that he will not be sacked for a period of time rather than making it so founder friendly
5. In a classic example where a VC invests $4MM of a $10MM company for 40% stakes & if the company gets sold for $100MM. How much will the VC make out of it if we go by considering the Class F stock

I want to know some facts from the VC Angle:
1. How will this change of accepting Class F stock affect VC’s if they have such high voting right & board rights. What will be the role of a VC who has a board seat if the founders blindly keep passing all the bills just because they have more than 50% control at all times.
2. How can we have even play
3. I feel Class F is too founder friendly, how can we alter the voting power & board votes ratio to be in such a way that can have a level playing field
4. Understand that the CEO’s are getting laid off with out reason. We could have a founder friendly clause saying that he will not be sacked for a period of time rather than making it so founder friendly
5. In a classic example where a VC invests $4MM of a $10MM company for 40% stakes & if the company gets sold for $100MM. How much will the VC make out of it if we go by considering the Class F stock