<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reverse Breakup Fees:  Making Acquisitions Less Risky for the Selling Company</title>
	<atom:link href="http://startuplawyer.com/merger-acquisition/reverse-breakup-fees-making-acquisitions-less-risky-for-the-selling-company/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://startuplawyer.com/merger-acquisition/reverse-breakup-fees-making-acquisitions-less-risky-for-the-selling-company</link>
	<description>Startup Law, Incorporation, Convertible Notes, Preferred Stock, Stock Options, Venture Capital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:35:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Bishops</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/merger-acquisition/reverse-breakup-fees-making-acquisitions-less-risky-for-the-selling-company#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Bishops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=179#comment-119</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that &#8220;some&#8221; risk may come out of transaction for the seller, but even at the 3% mark, it&#8217;s likely not a high enough of an incentive to save a sour M&amp;A ....it&#8217;s more like a slap on the wrist </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that &ldquo;some&rdquo; risk may come out of transaction for the seller, but even at the 3% mark, it&rsquo;s likely not a high enough of an incentive to save a sour M&amp;A &#8230;.it&rsquo;s more like a slap on the wrist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Bishops</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/merger-acquisition/reverse-breakup-fees-making-acquisitions-less-risky-for-the-selling-company#comment-2436</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Bishops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=179#comment-2436</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that &#8220;some&#8221; risk may come out of transaction for the seller, but even at the 3% mark, it&#8217;s likely not a high enough of an incentive to save a sour M&amp;A ....it&#8217;s more like a slap on the wrist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that &ldquo;some&rdquo; risk may come out of transaction for the seller, but even at the 3% mark, it&rsquo;s likely not a high enough of an incentive to save a sour M&amp;A &#8230;.it&rsquo;s more like a slap on the wrist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reverse Breakup Fees are Becoming Standard for Private Equity Deals &#124; The Startup Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/merger-acquisition/reverse-breakup-fees-making-acquisitions-less-risky-for-the-selling-company#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Reverse Breakup Fees are Becoming Standard for Private Equity Deals &#124; The Startup Lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=179#comment-120</guid>
		<description>[...] looks as though private equity buyers better get used to seeing reverse breakup fees and other seller-friendly provisions as part of their merger agreements for LBO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] looks as though private equity buyers better get used to seeing reverse breakup fees and other seller-friendly provisions as part of their merger agreements for LBO [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

