<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Preferred Stock:  Where &#8220;F&#8221; in a Class Can Equal Success</title>
	<atom:link href="http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/preferred-stock-where-f-in-a-class-can-equal-success/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/preferred-stock-where-f-in-a-class-can-equal-success</link>
	<description>Startup Law, Incorporation, Convertible Notes, Preferred Stock, Stock Options, Venture Capital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:35:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Roberts</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/preferred-stock-where-f-in-a-class-can-equal-success#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=621#comment-297</guid>
		<description>I agree.  And we&#039;ll probably see a lot of that (common taking big hits) given the lower valuations going around. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  And we&#39;ll probably see a lot of that (common taking big hits) given the lower valuations going around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Roberts</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/preferred-stock-where-f-in-a-class-can-equal-success#comment-2639</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=621#comment-2639</guid>
		<description>I agree.  And we&#039;ll probably see a lot of that (common taking big hits) given the lower valuations going around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  And we&#039;ll probably see a lot of that (common taking big hits) given the lower valuations going around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FN</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/preferred-stock-where-f-in-a-class-can-equal-success#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>FN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=621#comment-298</guid>
		<description>True, companies often survive through an E-, F- or later round, but as you know, Common usually gets wiped out after the 3rd or maybe the 4th round.  Even if they&#039;re not completely wiped out, Common is under such a large preference stack that they might as well be. 
 
The fact that startups last through these later rounds is mostly the result of a perverse incentive the VCs have (they&#039;re playing with other people&#039;s money and they get 20% of any upside so hope is always around the corner). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, companies often survive through an E-, F- or later round, but as you know, Common usually gets wiped out after the 3rd or maybe the 4th round.  Even if they&#39;re not completely wiped out, Common is under such a large preference stack that they might as well be. </p>
<p>The fact that startups last through these later rounds is mostly the result of a perverse incentive the VCs have (they&#39;re playing with other people&#39;s money and they get 20% of any upside so hope is always around the corner).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FN</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/preferred-stock/preferred-stock-where-f-in-a-class-can-equal-success#comment-2640</link>
		<dc:creator>FN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=621#comment-2640</guid>
		<description>True, companies often survive through an E-, F- or later round, but as you know, Common usually gets wiped out after the 3rd or maybe the 4th round.  Even if they&#039;re not completely wiped out, Common is under such a large preference stack that they might as well be. 
 
The fact that startups last through these later rounds is mostly the result of a perverse incentive the VCs have (they&#039;re playing with other people&#039;s money and they get 20% of any upside so hope is always around the corner).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, companies often survive through an E-, F- or later round, but as you know, Common usually gets wiped out after the 3rd or maybe the 4th round.  Even if they&#039;re not completely wiped out, Common is under such a large preference stack that they might as well be. </p>
<p>The fact that startups last through these later rounds is mostly the result of a perverse incentive the VCs have (they&#039;re playing with other people&#039;s money and they get 20% of any upside so hope is always around the corner).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

