<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Invention Agreements: A Potential Startup Killer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://startuplawyer.com/startup-issues/invention-agreements-a-potential-startup-killer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://startuplawyer.com/startup-issues/invention-agreements-a-potential-startup-killer</link>
	<description>Startup Law, Incorporation, Convertible Notes, Preferred Stock, Stock Options, Venture Capital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:35:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl's Desk</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/startup-issues/invention-agreements-a-potential-startup-killer#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl's Desk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 05:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/startup-issues/invention-agreements-a-potential-startup-killer#comment-93</guid>
		<description>I have seen many advisors end up with a claim on the start up company&#039;s IP when the start up refused to pay for the services of the advisor.  An inventions agreement is one of the most important agreement to get signed by any advisor or contractor that gets involved in the early days of a startup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen many advisors end up with a claim on the start up company&#8217;s IP when the start up refused to pay for the services of the advisor.  An inventions agreement is one of the most important agreement to get signed by any advisor or contractor that gets involved in the early days of a startup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rice</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/startup-issues/invention-agreements-a-potential-startup-killer#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/startup-issues/invention-agreements-a-potential-startup-killer#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Hi Ryan,

Thanks for posting this. I&#039;m studying restrictive covenants in IP right now. I can imagine that the plaintiff would want to sue the advisee if it does well, but if the advisee company isn&#039;t away of the agreement, do you think it could defend on that ground?

Or, would it have to be some kind of tortious interference with contract claim? We never touched that in my torts class (only did negligence), so I&#039;m not sure what the requirements are for its proof, but I would think some kind of intent element would be there. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ryan,</p>
<p>Thanks for posting this. I&#8217;m studying restrictive covenants in IP right now. I can imagine that the plaintiff would want to sue the advisee if it does well, but if the advisee company isn&#8217;t away of the agreement, do you think it could defend on that ground?</p>
<p>Or, would it have to be some kind of tortious interference with contract claim? We never touched that in my torts class (only did negligence), so I&#8217;m not sure what the requirements are for its proof, but I would think some kind of intent element would be there. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rice</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/startup-issues/invention-agreements-a-potential-startup-killer#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/startup-issues/invention-agreements-a-potential-startup-killer#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I meant to say &quot;aware&quot; not &quot;away of the agreement&quot;... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I meant to say &quot;aware&quot; not &quot;away of the agreement&quot;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rice</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/startup-issues/invention-agreements-a-potential-startup-killer#comment-2416</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/startup-issues/invention-agreements-a-potential-startup-killer#comment-2416</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I meant to say &quot;aware&quot; not &quot;away of the agreement&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I meant to say &quot;aware&quot; not &quot;away of the agreement&quot;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

