<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stock for Fees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://startuplawyer.com/startup-issues/stock-for-fees/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://startuplawyer.com/startup-issues/stock-for-fees</link>
	<description>Startup Law, Incorporation, Convertible Notes, Preferred Stock, Stock Options, Venture Capital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:35:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorenzo Lindall</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/startup-issues/stock-for-fees#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorenzo Lindall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=1021#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>Great to see some real content on a blog for once instead of the normal junk I have been reading. Keep up the good work </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see some real content on a blog for once instead of the normal junk I have been reading. Keep up the good work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorenzo Lindall</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/startup-issues/stock-for-fees#comment-2657</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorenzo Lindall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=1021#comment-2657</guid>
		<description>Great to see some real content on a blog for once instead of the normal junk I have been reading. Keep up the good work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see some real content on a blog for once instead of the normal junk I have been reading. Keep up the good work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Servicing a Startup &#171; Perspectivas</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/startup-issues/stock-for-fees#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Servicing a Startup &#171; Perspectivas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 15:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=1021#comment-370</guid>
		<description>[...] I think I found one. Filtering through Twitter&#8217;s torrential activity feeds I found a post at a corporate lawyer&#8217;s blog shedding some light over a common practice used by professional service providers when engaging [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I think I found one. Filtering through Twitter&#8217;s torrential activity feeds I found a post at a corporate lawyer&#8217;s blog shedding some light over a common practice used by professional service providers when engaging [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Roberts</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/startup-issues/stock-for-fees#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 11:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=1021#comment-369</guid>
		<description>I believe the firms that defer work typically get a small percentage of common in return for deferring until a Series A or other raise amount.  I don&#039;t really have a firm policy on payment terms for early stage start-ups. 
 
Early work is almost always done on a flat-fee basis. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the firms that defer work typically get a small percentage of common in return for deferring until a Series A or other raise amount.  I don&#39;t really have a firm policy on payment terms for early stage start-ups. </p>
<p>Early work is almost always done on a flat-fee basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Roberts</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/startup-issues/stock-for-fees#comment-2656</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 11:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=1021#comment-2656</guid>
		<description>I believe the firms that defer work typically get a small percentage of common in return for deferring until a Series A or other raise amount.  I don&#039;t really have a firm policy on payment terms for early stage start-ups. 
 
Early work is almost always done on a flat-fee basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the firms that defer work typically get a small percentage of common in return for deferring until a Series A or other raise amount.  I don&#039;t really have a firm policy on payment terms for early stage start-ups. </p>
<p>Early work is almost always done on a flat-fee basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/startup-issues/stock-for-fees#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=1021#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Ryan, 
 
Are there any alternative payment terms that you make for early stage start-ups that are strapped for cash? I have heard that some of the larger firms (like the Fenwicks and Cooley Godwards of the world) will sometimes agree to postpone payment until the client gets their Series A financing, or might accept other delayed payment terms. Do you do any of this in your practice? 
 
Also, when you do very early stage work, like incorporation, drafting shareholder agreements, etc. do you normally do that on an hourly basis or more of a flat flee basis? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, </p>
<p>Are there any alternative payment terms that you make for early stage start-ups that are strapped for cash? I have heard that some of the larger firms (like the Fenwicks and Cooley Godwards of the world) will sometimes agree to postpone payment until the client gets their Series A financing, or might accept other delayed payment terms. Do you do any of this in your practice? </p>
<p>Also, when you do very early stage work, like incorporation, drafting shareholder agreements, etc. do you normally do that on an hourly basis or more of a flat flee basis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce</title>
		<link>http://startuplawyer.com/startup-issues/stock-for-fees#comment-2655</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestartuplawyer.com/?p=1021#comment-2655</guid>
		<description>Ryan, 
 
Are there any alternative payment terms that you make for early stage start-ups that are strapped for cash? I have heard that some of the larger firms (like the Fenwicks and Cooley Godwards of the world) will sometimes agree to postpone payment until the client gets their Series A financing, or might accept other delayed payment terms. Do you do any of this in your practice? 
 
Also, when you do very early stage work, like incorporation, drafting shareholder agreements, etc. do you normally do that on an hourly basis or more of a flat flee basis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, </p>
<p>Are there any alternative payment terms that you make for early stage start-ups that are strapped for cash? I have heard that some of the larger firms (like the Fenwicks and Cooley Godwards of the world) will sometimes agree to postpone payment until the client gets their Series A financing, or might accept other delayed payment terms. Do you do any of this in your practice? </p>
<p>Also, when you do very early stage work, like incorporation, drafting shareholder agreements, etc. do you normally do that on an hourly basis or more of a flat flee basis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

